Posts Tagged ‘David Lammy’

Can we calculate party affiliation? (The Westminster edition)

Friday, February 13th, 2009

This is a follow-up post to Why doesn’t the Tory MP have Twitter friends? — a report on some early research into the interrelationships between the few Westminster MPs who are on Twitter.

According to Tweetminster, the number of UK MPs on Twitter has doubled since this time last month. Where there were eight Twittering MPs, there are now sixteen. Here’s the map that shows who follows whom (the labels may be too small to read — if you want to see a larger image, click on the map.

Actual factions among Westminster MPs on Twitter

I’ve coloured each node to show party affiliation; for those of you who are unfamiliar with British politics, Labour (our left-of-centre party) shows up in red, Conservatives (our right-of-centre party) in blue, and Liberal Democrats (what it says on the tin) in yellow.

The size of each node represents the individual’s “betweenness centrality” — a network analysis term that helps us place a value on individuals within a network. To give you a sense of what it means, the higher the betweenness centrality of an individual, the greater the impact when you take them out of the network. For those of you who work in large companies, it may be worth noting that senior management’s personal assistants generally have very high betweenness — something that is mostly remarked upon when they go on holiday (simultaneous translation: “take a vacation”.)

So far so good. By now, regular readers will probably be kissing their teeth and thinking “so what?” I’ve done a lot of these Twitter maps in the past and the novelty must be wearing off on you by now.

So here’s the thing. There are a few network analysis techniques that let one identify cliques and factions. What we’ve got here is a small set where we already know what people’s affiliations should be. How interesting, I thought, would it be to see how well the calculated result fits the real world data? Here’s what I found:
(more…)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in measurement, networks, research, twitter | 10 Comments »

Why doesn’t the Tory MP have Twitter friends?

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

Relations between MP twitterers

This is a map of the eight Westminster MPs who are currently on Twitter, and the relationships between them. The larger the blob, the more followers they have among their peers. Apparently they’re a fairly clubbable lot, all – that is – except for Grant Shapps who (it seems) currently has no MP friends on Twitter. I’d say that it’s early days yet, but Mr Shapps appears to have been broadcasting since March 9th 2008. That’s an age in Twitter years. In that period, he has replied to 5 people out of a total of 249 tweets. Lots of people have tried to reach him.

I think that it’s nice that he’s so busy (after all, he has a constituency to run and a government to topple) but do think that if he’s going to do this, he ought to pay a little more attention.

Who (other than each other) are MPs most likely to follow? If we wanted to get a story in front of their noses, who would we most want to talk to? Here’s the list. Tweetminster is like Tweetcongress but with more tea and scones and fewer public representatives. The ubiquitous Stephen Fry is in place, of course. It wouldn’t be Twitter without him.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in networks, twitter | 16 Comments »