-
Francis Ingham — DG of the PRCA — weighs in on the story in the comments section of this post.
-
paidContent:UK has a nice straightforward article on the NLA's mindless attempt to charge for free content.
-
OMFG ROFL — The Newspaper Licensing Agency wants to charge us for sending URLs to clients (see the linked PDF — <a href="http://www.nla.co.uk/pdf/Guide%20to%20Electronic%20Distribution%20April%202009b.pdf">A Guide to Electronic Distribution</a>.) Can we take this seriously?
-
J&J <a href="http://jnjbtw.com/2009/05/calling-mommy-vloggers/">called upon Mommy vloggers</a> to submit videos on topics "relevant to them" — a nice idea, but one, as you'll see, that generated little interest either in the way of video submissions (8 videos submitted after 6 months as at July 9, 2009) or views (fewer than 15K.) Needs more investment, or more thought.
-
This looks like a best-practice example for pharma company blogging. There's little evidence for consumer interest: most of the inbound links seem to be talking about this as an example of "corporate blogs" and "marketing" rather than as a source of what we might broadly term "medical information." But there's some great evidence of <a href="http://www.postrank.com/feed/38238b9c95b44e75f747871bccf68c70">outreach and linkbait</a> — clearly this is a platform for activity on the broader web, rather than a simple content site
0 Responses to “links for 2009-07-10”
Leave a Reply