<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating blog seed lists for research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/</link>
	<description>a blog by mat morrison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Morrison</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-4212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/?p=803#comment-4212</guid>
		<description>As usual, Brendan, there is method to your madness. But there&#039;s also prior art. WIPO (the organization that helps protect Intellectual Property around the world) is continually beset by &quot;sucks domain arbitrations. What is a &quot;sucks&quot; domain? It&#039;s when a cybersquatter* adds &quot;sucks&quot; to your domain and registers the result. Examples include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0662.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wal-martsucks.com&lt;/a&gt; (2000), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-1195.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;philipssucks.com&lt;/a&gt; (2001), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-1015.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lockheedmartinsucks.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0168.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;airfrancesucks.com&lt;/a&gt;, and the slightly more agressive &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-0918.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fucknetscape.com&lt;/a&gt; (2001)

In the past, domain name squatters tended to lose to the trademark owner. Recently, however, they have begun to win, and win often. Indeed, it has got to the point where many domain name strategies recommend that large firms actually register their own &quot;sucks&quot; domain to prevent malicious abuse. Indeed, the COI &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coi.gov.uk/guidance.php?page=194&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recommends defensive registration&lt;/a&gt;.

Incidentally, I was so amused by this article by Rocket&#039;s Nick Crossland  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickcrossland.co.uk/blog/2008/everything.sucks&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;everything.sucks - a TLD for complaints&lt;/a&gt; (I came across it looking for the COI page) that I thought I&#039;d share it.

* I detest words with &quot;cyber&quot; in them, but &quot;cybersquatter&quot; is the worst yet. Sounds like a constipated robot, doesn&#039;t it? It gets worse. The COI uses the term &quot;cybersmearing&quot;. Robot on dirty protest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, Brendan, there is method to your madness. But there&#8217;s also prior art. WIPO (the organization that helps protect Intellectual Property around the world) is continually beset by &#8220;sucks domain arbitrations. What is a &#8220;sucks&#8221; domain? It&#8217;s when a cybersquatter* adds &#8220;sucks&#8221; to your domain and registers the result. Examples include <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-0662.html" rel="nofollow">wal-martsucks.com</a> (2000), <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-1195.html" rel="nofollow">philipssucks.com</a> (2001), <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2000/d2000-1015.html" rel="nofollow">lockheedmartinsucks.com</a>, <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0168.html" rel="nofollow">airfrancesucks.com</a>, and the slightly more agressive <a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-0918.html" rel="nofollow">fucknetscape.com</a> (2001)</p>
<p>In the past, domain name squatters tended to lose to the trademark owner. Recently, however, they have begun to win, and win often. Indeed, it has got to the point where many domain name strategies recommend that large firms actually register their own &#8220;sucks&#8221; domain to prevent malicious abuse. Indeed, the COI <a href="http://www.coi.gov.uk/guidance.php?page=194" rel="nofollow">recommends defensive registration</a>.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I was so amused by this article by Rocket&#8217;s Nick Crossland  <a href="http://www.nickcrossland.co.uk/blog/2008/everything.sucks" rel="nofollow">everything.sucks &#8211; a TLD for complaints</a> (I came across it looking for the COI page) that I thought I&#8217;d share it.</p>
<p>* I detest words with &#8220;cyber&#8221; in them, but &#8220;cybersquatter&#8221; is the worst yet. Sounds like a constipated robot, doesn&#8217;t it? It gets worse. The COI uses the term &#8220;cybersmearing&#8221;. Robot on dirty protest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-4196</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/?p=803#comment-4196</guid>
		<description>PPS I obviously paid so much attention to my links and italics I forgot to close all my quotation marks. Lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPS I obviously paid so much attention to my links and italics I forgot to close all my quotation marks. Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/?p=803#comment-4195</guid>
		<description>Really like the idea of searching on delicious for brandname + &quot;cool&quot;. So much in fact that I just looked up synonyms for &#039;cool&#039;, so that I could say to clients &quot;Look, no one thinks you&#039;re cool/wicked/sorted/sick&quot;. 

Unfortunately the online Thesaurus isn&#039;t particularly culturally aware, so I&#039;ve got the choice of saying (literally) &quot;Look, no one thinks you&#039;re algid/frigid/hawkish/shivery/snappy/wintry&quot; or (closer figuratively but culturally way off the mark) &quot;Look, no one thinks you&#039;re boss/dandy/divine/glorious/hunky-dory/keen/marvelous[sic]/neat/nifty/sensational/swell&quot;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cool&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Urban dictionary gets closer to &#039;cool&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. I can now say &quot;Look, no one thinks you&#039;re kewl/awesome/nice/great/&quot;

But what is &#039;cool&#039; anyway? Again, the Urban dictionary offers good cultural references: it offers a suggestion for what it is not (&quot;&lt;i&gt;Pantaloons are not cool&lt;/i&gt;); and what it is: &lt;i&gt;&quot;a simplified way of telling someone to shut the fuck up because you don&#039;t give a shit.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

Alternatively you could see whether anyone thinks your client is shit. &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/shit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The official online thesaurus offers no synonyms or antonyms&lt;/a&gt;, but does make me an offer to &#039;explore shit in the visual thesaurus&#039;, which I think I&#039;ll decline. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Urban dictionary is much more forthcoming&lt;/a&gt;, but I think a more appropriate antonym would be &#039;sucks&#039; or &#039;lame&#039;, to wit (again, courtesy of the urban dictionary): &lt;i&gt;&quot;sucks - is not good. is, in fact, bad.  lame - sarah got a butterfly tattoo on her lower back. that&#039;s so lame, i&#039;d rather get a dick on mine, at least i&#039;ll be more original.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

PS You need a &#039;preview&#039; button for comments, I have no idea whether all this care and attention I paid to putting links and italics in is going to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really like the idea of searching on delicious for brandname + &#8220;cool&#8221;. So much in fact that I just looked up synonyms for &#8216;cool&#8217;, so that I could say to clients &#8220;Look, no one thinks you&#8217;re cool/wicked/sorted/sick&#8221;. </p>
<p>Unfortunately the online Thesaurus isn&#8217;t particularly culturally aware, so I&#8217;ve got the choice of saying (literally) &#8220;Look, no one thinks you&#8217;re algid/frigid/hawkish/shivery/snappy/wintry&#8221; or (closer figuratively but culturally way off the mark) &#8220;Look, no one thinks you&#8217;re boss/dandy/divine/glorious/hunky-dory/keen/marvelous[sic]/neat/nifty/sensational/swell&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cool" rel="nofollow">The Urban dictionary gets closer to &#8216;cool&#8217;</a>. I can now say &#8220;Look, no one thinks you&#8217;re kewl/awesome/nice/great/&#8221;</p>
<p>But what is &#8216;cool&#8217; anyway? Again, the Urban dictionary offers good cultural references: it offers a suggestion for what it is not (&#8220;<i>Pantaloons are not cool</i>); and what it is: <i>&#8220;a simplified way of telling someone to shut the fuck up because you don&#8217;t give a shit.&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>Alternatively you could see whether anyone thinks your client is shit. <a href="http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/shit" rel="nofollow">The official online thesaurus offers no synonyms or antonyms</a>, but does make me an offer to &#8216;explore shit in the visual thesaurus&#8217;, which I think I&#8217;ll decline. <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shit" rel="nofollow">The Urban dictionary is much more forthcoming</a>, but I think a more appropriate antonym would be &#8216;sucks&#8217; or &#8216;lame&#8217;, to wit (again, courtesy of the urban dictionary): <i>&#8220;sucks &#8211; is not good. is, in fact, bad.  lame &#8211; sarah got a butterfly tattoo on her lower back. that&#8217;s so lame, i&#8217;d rather get a dick on mine, at least i&#8217;ll be more original.&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>PS You need a &#8216;preview&#8217; button for comments, I have no idea whether all this care and attention I paid to putting links and italics in is going to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rebeiro</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2009/02/creating-blog-seed-lists-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rebeiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/?p=803#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>Really useful post Mat - cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really useful post Mat &#8211; cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

