<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Map of top 50 UK PR twitter people and their followers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/</link>
	<description>a blog by mat morrison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jemima!

A few notes:

&lt;ol&gt;

&lt;li&gt;I agree, we don&#039;t know &quot;if people are reading each others&#039; tweets&quot;, but we do see a lot of reciprocation here (i.e. &quot;you follow me so I follow you&quot;). &lt;em&gt;Reciprocity&lt;/em&gt; is one of those social behaviours that is a big pointer for community-formation (which is interesting to us for all sorts of reasons), but it&#039;s also one of those behaviours that&#039;s easiest to influence. As such, it is also a &quot;foot in the door&quot; -- people are many times more likely to respond to someone to whom they have &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; reciprocated than they are to respond to a stranger. So we know &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; about these people and their relationships.
&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;We&#039;ve got new data (collected and processed over the past weekend, so I&#039;ll be releasing some of the findings here. Lots of data tables for people to play with, should they be so inclined. It&#039;s all a lot easier to read than this!&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;But really (like you) we&#039;re still not really satisfied. So I&#039;m just setting up an eavesdropper bot that will listen in to the seed list&#039;s conversations and pull out any words with &quot;@&quot; in them (for those of you who don&#039;t twitter, these words signify tweets addressed to other users) and sotre them for statistical analysis. Expect data and results in the new year.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jemima!</p>
<p>A few notes:</p>
<ol>
<li>I agree, we don&#8217;t know &#8220;if people are reading each others&#8217; tweets&#8221;, but we do see a lot of reciprocation here (i.e. &#8220;you follow me so I follow you&#8221;). <em>Reciprocity</em> is one of those social behaviours that is a big pointer for community-formation (which is interesting to us for all sorts of reasons), but it&#8217;s also one of those behaviours that&#8217;s easiest to influence. As such, it is also a &#8220;foot in the door&#8221; &#8212; people are many times more likely to respond to someone to whom they have <em>already</em> reciprocated than they are to respond to a stranger. So we know <em>something</em> about these people and their relationships.
</li>
<li>We&#8217;ve got new data (collected and processed over the past weekend, so I&#8217;ll be releasing some of the findings here. Lots of data tables for people to play with, should they be so inclined. It&#8217;s all a lot easier to read than this!</li>
<li>But really (like you) we&#8217;re still not really satisfied. So I&#8217;m just setting up an eavesdropper bot that will listen in to the seed list&#8217;s conversations and pull out any words with &#8220;@&#8221; in them (for those of you who don&#8217;t twitter, these words signify tweets addressed to other users) and sotre them for statistical analysis. Expect data and results in the new year.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jemima Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jemima Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaczar.com/blog/2008/12/map-of-top-50-uk-pr-twitter-people-and-their-followers/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Hi Mat,
As you know, I LOVE this tool you&#039;re developing. I guess Twitter is a great one to model as the paths of communication are so defined. Although you don&#039;t actually know if people are reading each others&#039; Tweets even if they subscribe to them, but following at least shows respect for someone&#039;s views. Would love to talk to you more to see if there&#039;s some way of doing a mash-up between the Rufus map and research for my leadership 2.0 book. I have your no so will call you - prob Wednesday when the toddler&#039;s away!
Jemima</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mat,<br />
As you know, I LOVE this tool you&#8217;re developing. I guess Twitter is a great one to model as the paths of communication are so defined. Although you don&#8217;t actually know if people are reading each others&#8217; Tweets even if they subscribe to them, but following at least shows respect for someone&#8217;s views. Would love to talk to you more to see if there&#8217;s some way of doing a mash-up between the Rufus map and research for my leadership 2.0 book. I have your no so will call you &#8211; prob Wednesday when the toddler&#8217;s away!<br />
Jemima</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
